Cicely Hello. When you read certain passages written of which has q memorize words as "self-(geno-pheno-ego)-eco-re-(retro-meta)-organization," he realizes q live in complex world. And this discovery, like any discovery by the complexity above, implies its positive and negative part. The negative is q was much more comfortable in the realm of simple. Than black or white, yes or no, the I like or not like you, of you want or do not want you, women from Venus and men from Mars, etc.. Finally, this logic divalent q mostly all of us participate and which usually govern and evaluate our joys, our sorrows, our successes, our failures, etc.
the positive side of the case is q when things do not fit, one realizes q q bivalent hammer has been using all his life (always refused q q proudly ask us, I was the first), does not fit the parts for the aforementioned pieces use "other holes. " And then, as the discovery of q perplexed child learns best to use her toy, one suddenly exclaims: "Wow!". And what happens next? Show me understand what I q summarize the Buddhist nirvana, one is not happy, but perhaps a little less stupid. Especially someone less stupid q q Buddhist nirvana more than expected, but that's another subject.
We have that kind of intellectual hindrance q we strained through sight when we look at the rest of the world. We see the physical forms separated from each other and use the space in a logical rather than a real way. Drag and a concept of individual "islands" when we really do not seem to realize we are human beings q "mainland", connected to thousands of spheres whether physical, biological, ideological, sociological, psychological, etc. And the fact that q does not understand why there are many situations in our daily lives, should make us reflect on what the evaluative paradigm q no background in our evaluations. Maybe then see how that thing slips bivalent from the depths of our being to avoid letting us live in peace with our inconsistencies and contradictions of life itself.
I am now more aware
q q ever life is poetry. And I can assure q q I do not mean to me is nice, but because I think it's true. Poetry does not mean to say life is beautiful q, q is beautiful, or q is smooth like a poem, but q is the contrary that and .. and .. and essentially constant, ie, complex in its simplicity, its paradoxical emotion, and mixed between passion and deception, between anger and impotence, between admiration and contempt .. Well, now I think q may not be entirely accurate. In fact you tend to think q, as a work of art, poetry is something timeless. In that case, say q is like a book of poems q is spanned by the arrow of time, q has its beginning and its end .. q gives rise to other principles and other purposes unbecoming q probably said so far and in turn complete it.
No, I'm not in poetry. Even in the most scientific analysis of reality, you discover how light, for example, plays with his own metaphor, making ever burst logic of identity in existential duality capricious as wave and corpuscle. Or how the entire universe shattering represents a basic disorder can lead to the necessary interactions q give rise to organizational phenomena of matter. And believe me Poetry q becomes more and more complex, the more we deepen.
The reality is complex. I'm saying with this q no q are simple things? By God, no. Since complexity can always watch it simple. However, if we start from the simple, we leave out the complex input. In this regard, and with all respect to Mr Occam and his razor, q I firmly believe the solution to problems not usually the simplest. Q The least we can do sometimes is to forgive the reality and forgive ourselves as members of it, and try to order amendments thereto.
never too late.
0 comments:
Post a Comment