Cicely Hello. Lately I have drawn attention to an advertising campaign q has become quite famous, q started spreading on buses in England, and q and can be seen in some capitals of our territory. Q I guess the campaign is already known to all, but just in case, then an image attached to the advertising model in question:
A message really clear, concise and direct. And a slogan q tb itself has a lot of chicha, a little q you stop to think. Basically, the thesis is being defended is q q q everyone knows in reality that the existence of God is probably a hoax, and q Quit worrying and enjoy your life. Why so much concern for q probably be there? Well, at first seems a very reasonable proposal ... server reaction: Oh my God (q probably do not exist), what a scandal ...
q
When people ask me why without being a believer defend budgets religious, I reply q q the fact many people endorse his atheism from these campaigns (or other absurd arguments like that), and q try to fool me go against ell @ s, a server (as Nietzsche was wrong with the religious) makes him horny.
It's funny, but many religious sectors have been offended by these ads. I, of being religious, I feel rather proud. What I mean is q q, with q I say then what hope is q q be the q atheists sectors are offended. But not for me, if not because of atheism q "defend" this slogan. Ya
first, someone says something so q q has no idea what pajolera minimally characterized the condition q human. And I can not believe q q the highbrow (because if more than one, we already def two) q shift has invented this pearl has not taken into account, and the whole history of philosophy, but the whole q history of knowledge from man-Huga Huga said. And the situations are so varied, there is no q q think about abstract things. And if not, q told, for example, our friend Marco q "probably will not find his mother for a long q's look, then stop worrying q q enjoy your life" ... Mother, I do not think the insults q would come from the mouth of that cute kid with such advice. And
q first (and eliminating the part of expletives): Who q are you to tell me I'm not going to find my mother? And second: How could I stop worrying? I do not know, perhaps based horchata into a vein injections maybe I miss, but if we are talking about things I really q play (and the slogan q presupposes the existence of God is truly concerned q), as I can "move the issue" and you are? How I can just "stop worrying"? I do not know, is the first example q is nonsense came into my head, but I think q is q very illustrative of what I mean. Q But if I get 10 seconds to think I can think of 100 examples: Did you leave one to worry about love, by the fact of q is not currently partner? Perhaps leave one to worry about eating, by the fact food is not currently q? EtceterÃsima etc. to infinity and beyond. Q
But there is not all. This statement, as I said earlier in another program, another mine is philosophical (aunq of a different caliber). Q And, as I said before, certain religious groups have been scrambling and then are willing to criticize this statement, and other phrases to create their own in the religious sense (which I feel a tantrum as absurd as that of atheist proposition in question, at least as far as I've read of evangelical groups and such). In the q come to discuss is q the / the prodigy / s creative / s of the atheist slogan, cool to go over yet, we defend / n of these attacks of religious groups saying a moment q, q ell @ s just say (in a completely sensible attitude from reason open ... ^ _ ^ U) q " probably no God." Eye, emphasize this because we are not saying outright, and thinkers are atheists q super mega cool, super modern, super tolerant, reasonable and super super everything.
super mega Well dear people, before going to champions of modern atheism and papering bus left and right, think a little bit and realize q, for starters, there is not a probable, but any case a possible ( basic course of Metaphysics ECAC). This is a server q (q @ you my dear listener) there is not likely. O exists or not. No more. Or put another way, q us we doubt God's existence, not more or less likely. This is the great fallacy of the list @ q shift (or not-so-list @, as sometimes shown) we try to sneak (consciously or unconsciously) to defend atheism. Now God is there or not. But its existence can never be likely or unlikely. In any case it will be his show, but not its existence as such, q is very different.
Well, not to get excited curl q, q if you just want to say this kind of campaign is best q can think of against the existence of God, I'm going to have to put q pray for the poor atheism. At least for q atheism can boast of being with a minimum of intellectual seriousness (Mr. Richard Dawkins, for example).
Moral: thought q q atheists are the most horny now put me in matters of religion. Now I just discovered atheists q q q say God does not exist probably make me 1000 times.
Until the next show!
0 comments:
Post a Comment