Cicely Hello. Today I overheard two people talking about certain tragic events on the young q perpetrated a massacre not long ago. Q q I know was apparently (or by commenting on these people) means q echoed the aforementioned young man was very fond of a popular computer game called "Counter-Strike." "Yes, the kind of hitting shots," said the partners. "Of course, this is normal q pass those things," he continued. Well, from there and disconnected because my brain could not process such drivel.
q The case is that fact reminded me of a certain event q q has to do with this kind of reasoning, so curious and dangerously extended, q sadly I had the opportunity to see precisely q something I love so much.
time ago I had the opportunity to attend an aikido where the mouth of a teacher (by the very fact of being a teacher) I q qa hear what I think was a very unfortunate intervention. This teacher had made fun of people q q conception, aikido, the way in q, for example, I do, that is, trying to get closer to the philosophy of the founder q defined it as an art of peace, not violence.
course, my disappointment was not for the fact q had a different view to mine because, for starters, the design is not mine but the founder. But hey, there each with its conception. The sad thing is how poor the argument. Q And hear me for some time, you know a server q has a weakness for poor arguments.
q I have always said it is not q say, but of why you say it. And in this case, the teacher justified his position from the q I call "the classic argument of evil fork." Let me explain. Q We all know a fork is used for food. Well, tomorrow if q is in the news a man has killed another with a fork, q we say that man was murdered because of the evil fork? I bet my collection of Sandman comics aq would be unlikely. As well, the argument used that q teacher to disqualify the "classic" of aikido is aikidokas q q is used aikido to do harm, so there is no q q consider aikido in this way, "peace." Anyone see the resemblance of reasoning?
I call the classic argument from evil fork, but if it seems too aggressive, change holder for a bottle of anisette of the monkey. I do not mind. The result is the same. I call it classic, because we have crushed (and still hammering us) many times, such that the subject of RPGs evil, evil animated series, or q if I commented at the beginning of evil video games. All charges follow the same pattern, that is, blame the "fork" of the crime committed by the q carries it.
What is the solution then? Destroy all holders (or bottles of anisette of the monkey) of the planet? Q want to tell you that, but I think the smartest solution. We consider then the holder (or bottle) as an instrument of violence and street fighting? Nor do I q is the case. Rather, and with due respect to any teacher (in the case described aikido), or any other mind "lucid" q wants to convince me of that assertion, saying rather than demonize q forks, perhaps it should calm q are his own demons.
0 comments:
Post a Comment